Innnitary Default Logic for Speciication of Nonmonotonic Reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Joeri Engelfriet
  • V. Wiktor Marek
  • Jan Treur
چکیده

In this paper we study constructions leading to the formation of belief sets by agents. We focus on the situation when possible belief sets are built incrementally in stages. We call an innnite sequence of theories that represents such a process a reasoning trace. A set of reasoning traces describing all possible reasoning scenarios for the agent is called a reasoning frame. Default logic by Reiter is not powerful enough to represent reasoning frames. In the paper we introduce a generalization of default logic of Reiter by allowing innnite sets of justiications. We call this formalism innnitary default logic. In the main result of the paper we show that every reasoning frame can be represented by an innnitary default theory. A similar representability result for antichains of theories (belief frames) is also presented.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Innnitary Default Logic for Speciication of Nonmonotonic Reasoning A

In this paper we study constructions leading to the formation of belief sets by agents. We focus on the situation when possible belief sets are built incrementally in stages. We call an innnite sequence of theories that represents such a process a reasoning trace. A set of reasoning traces describing all possible reasoning scenarios for the agent is called a reasoning frame. Default logic by Re...

متن کامل

Axiomatization of Credulous Reasoning in Rational Default Logic

Nonmonotonic reasoning is succesfully formalized by the class of default logics. In this paper we introduce an axiomatic system for credulous reasoning in rational default logic. Based on classical sequent calculus and anti-sequent calculus, an abstract characterization of credulous nonmonotonic default inference in this variant of default logic is presented.

متن کامل

Nonmonotonic Skeptical Consequence Relation in Constrained Default Logic

This paper presents a study of the nonmonotonic consequence relation which models the skeptical reasoning formalised by constrained default logic. The nonmonotonic skeptical consequence relation is defined using the sequent calculus axiomatic system. We study the formal properties desirable for a “good” nonmonotonic relation: supraclassicality, cut, cautious monotony, cumulativity, absorption, ...

متن کامل

Default geasoning, Nonmonotonic Logics, and the Frame Problem

Nonmonotonic formal systems have been proposed as an extension to classical first-order logic that will capture the process of human “default reasoning” or “plausible inference” through their inference mechanisms just as modus ponena provides a model for deductive reasoning. But although the technical properties of these logics have been studied in detail and many examples of human default reas...

متن کامل

Default Reasoning, Nonmonotonic Logics, and the Frame Problem

Nonmonotonic formal systems have been proposed as an extension to classical first-order logic that will capture the process of human “default reasoning” or “plausible inference” through their inference mechanisms just as modus ponena provides a model for deductive reasoning. But although the technical properties of these logics have been studied in detail and many examples of human default reas...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996